review paper: The role of adhesion in contact mechanics
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 16(151), February 2019. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0738
Michele Ciavarella Junki Joe Junki Joe Antonio Papangelo James Richard Barber
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 16(151), February 2019. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0738
Michele Ciavarella Junki Joe Junki Joe Antonio Papangelo James Richard Barber
Just published in Journal of the Royal Society Interface
Ciavarella M, Joe J, Papangelo A, Barber JR. 2019 The role of adhesion in contact mechanics. J. R. Soc. Interface 16: 20180738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0738
<p>Applications are invited for PhD positions at the Algorithms in Medicine and Neuro-Technology Lab (AIMAN Lab) in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. "Research" The AIMAN Lab pursues fundamental breakthroughs in biomedical cyber-physical systems.
A postdoctoral position in the field of Computational damage geomechanics is open at Université Côte d'Azur.
This project is the result of a collaboration between Geoazur at Université de Nice, the Centre for Material Forming (CEMEF) at Mines ParisTech and the Laboratoire Jean-Alexandre Dieudonné (LJAD) at Université de Nice.
The implicit implementation of creep in abaqus requires dh/d(\delta \epsilon_c ) as Jacobian in Newton-Raphson's iteration. The derivative can be expanded as shown in the figure attached. The term dh/dq, the one underlined by a green stroke, is expected to be provided by users through specifying DECRA, whereas the term dq/d(\delta \epsilon), underlined by a red one, is confusing me. It seems that that term is computed by Abaqus but I have no idea how it is done. The same question applies to the last derivative on the right hand side.
Thank you very much !
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/37698
Hussein Rappel's new paper is out.
Dear All,
I am modelling a 3 point bend specimen with Cohesive elements tied to the upper and lower halves of the specimen in 2d.
The problem is that the CZ elements perform properly only for a combination of element sizes, i.e. a combination of element size of structure and CZ elements, for instance in my case the structure/specimen element size is 0.2mm and CZ is 0.001 or 0.002. For any other combination the adjacent elements bend as shown in the attached image.
I will be glad if someone could explain this behaviour and the solution.
ttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adfm.201806698
Yuan-Fang Zhang, Ningbin Zhang, Hardik Hingorani, Ningyuan Ding, Dong Wang, Chao Yuan, Biao Zhang, Guoying Gu,* and Qi Ge*