Submitted by Serkan Guler on Wed, 10/06/2010 - 15:09 Hi I am Serkan, I want to develope equivalent beam for arbitrary shapes of solid parts. Can you share your ideas me? Wenbin Yu This has been done using the This has been done using the variational asymptotic method, and implemented in a general-purpose beam modeling tool VABS . For a beam model to be accurate represent the 3D solid, the cross-section must be small comparing to the beam axis. Log in or register to post comments Tue, 03/01/2011 - 05:12 Permalink Serkan Guler Thank you for your advice. Thank you for your advice. Log in or register to post comments Sat, 12/03/2011 - 00:22 Permalink Wenbin Yu You are welcome to test a You are welcome to test a trial of the VABS code. Log in or register to post comments Tue, 12/06/2011 - 23:29 Permalink Log in or register to post comments4044 views
Wenbin Yu This has been done using the This has been done using the variational asymptotic method, and implemented in a general-purpose beam modeling tool VABS . For a beam model to be accurate represent the 3D solid, the cross-section must be small comparing to the beam axis. Log in or register to post comments Tue, 03/01/2011 - 05:12 Permalink
Serkan Guler Thank you for your advice. Thank you for your advice. Log in or register to post comments Sat, 12/03/2011 - 00:22 Permalink
Wenbin Yu You are welcome to test a You are welcome to test a trial of the VABS code. Log in or register to post comments Tue, 12/06/2011 - 23:29 Permalink
This has been done using the
This has been done using the variational asymptotic method, and implemented in a general-purpose beam modeling tool VABS . For a beam model to be accurate represent the 3D solid, the cross-section must be small comparing to the beam axis.
Thank you for your advice.
Thank you for your advice.
You are welcome to test a
You are welcome to test a trial of the VABS code.