Skip to main content

research

EML Webinar Young Researchers Forum by Tongqing Lu, on 18 April 2024: High throughput rupture experiments of soft materials

Submitted by Zheng Jia on

EML Webinar (Young Researchers Forum) on 18 April 2024 will be given by Tongqing Lu at Xi'an Jiaotong University

Title: High throughput rupture experiments of soft materials

Discussion leader: Zhigang Suo, Harvard University

Time: 10:00 am Boston, 3:00 pm London, 4:00 pm Paris, 10:00 pm Beijing on Thursday, 18 April 2024

Friction in Rolling a Cylinder on or Under a Viscoelastic Substrate with Adhesion

Submitted by Antonio Papangelo on

In classical experiments, it has been found that a rigid cylinder can roll both on and under an inclined rubber plane with a friction force that depends on a power law of velocity, independent of the sign of the normal force. Further, contact area increases significantly with velocity with a related power law. We try to model qualitatively these experiments with a numerical boundary element solution with a standard linear solid and we find for sufficiently large Maugis–Tabor parameter � qualitative agreement with experiments.

Optimizing deployment dynamics of composite tape-spring hinges

Submitted by Jinxiong Zhou on

The composite tape-spring hinge (CTSH) is a lightweight structural connector widely employed in space structures, including spacecraft and satellites, due to its high specific strength and stiffness. Introducing cutouts enables CTSH to possess folding and deployment capability, while optimizing the cutouts finely to optimize the performance of CTSH. However, the interaction between cutout size and the dynamic deployment of CTSH is a novel topic.

A mesoscale computational approach to predict ABD matrix of thin woven composites

Submitted by Jinxiong Zhou on

The ABD matrix is a fundamental method to characterize the overall stiffness behavior of laminated composite structures. Although classical laminate theory has been widely used, it has limitations in predicting the ABD matrix for woven composites. To address this issue, this paper presents a mesoscale homogenization approach aimed at computing the ABD matrix for thin woven composites accurately. The mesoscale representative volume element (RVE) of the woven composite is generated using TexGen and imposed with periodic boundary conditions to enforce the Kirchhoff thin plate assumption.

A hybrid proper orthogonal decomposition and next generation reservoir computing approach for high-dimensional chaotic prediction: Application to flow-induced vibration of tube bundles

Submitted by Jinxiong Zhou on

To address the significant challenges in predicting high-dimensional chaotic systems, this paper introduces a novel hybrid strategy that combines proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), which serves as reduced order modeling (ROM), with next generation reservoir computing (NGRC), a data-driven prediction model. The POD-NGRC strategy harnesses the strengths of POD in extracting principal evolutionary features and reducing system complexity, along with the high accuracy, ease of design, enhanced robustness, and high computational efficiency offered by NGRC.

Best Paper Award for Young Investigators - Int. J. Solids & Structures

Submitted by Rui Huang on

The International Journal of Solids and Structures is pleased to institute an annual Best Paper Award for Young Investigators. The award will be given annually to a paper published in the previous year whose principal or corresponding author is under the age of 38 or within 10 years of the completion of their PhD.

Common Misconceptions on Rules of Mixtures

Submitted by Wenbin Yu on

Please pardon me if I am preaching to the choir here. Rules of mixtures (ROM) are very simple mechanics models. Everybody on this site has a very good understanding of it. However, confusion and mistakes on ROM constantly appear in textbooks, journal articles, online learning materials, etc. See attached two wiki articles. The major confusing point is that vf*Ef+vm*Em is derived from the isostrain assumption and the upper bound. Both statements are incorrect. There might be two main reasons contributed to this mistake/confusion.