Skip to main content

Ask iMechanica

Description

If your topic fits none of the following forums, post it in this default forum

Issues with implementation of strain gradient plasticity framework of Niordson and Hutchinson (2003) in Abaqus UEL subroutine

Submitted by Suman.Guha on

I have implemented the rate-independent strain gradient plasticity framework of Niordson and Hutchinson (2003) in UEL. I was able to validate the results of the shear of infinitely wide thin layer between two rigid surfaces (Niordson and Hutchinson, 2003). However, the UEL subroutine fails to converge for the more complex problem of the shear of finite width slab. I suspect the convergence issues are arising out of internal elastic-plastic boundary conditions and the yield criteria. I have few doubts in this regard.

 

Is there any dissymetry of lift in the forward flight of the helicopter after applying the cyclic control?

Submitted by seepratik on

Dear friends,

I was curious about the time varying loads on the helicopter blades in the forward flight. After reaching lots of books and documents, I came to know that some control (cyclic) is applied to take care of the dissymetry of lift in the forward flight. My question is, if the dissymetry of lift is eliminated by applying the cyclic control or by blade flapping (whatever), then why the load should vary with time for the 90 and 270 position of the blade? Can anybody explain this? Please let me know the justification. I am really curious about it. 

Thanks

Piezoresistivity modeling with Ansys

Submitted by Egemen Teomete on
Choose a channel featured in the header of iMechanica
Dear Colleagues, 
 
I am working with ANSYS PDL to model a piezoresistive cement-based material; the material is assumed to be isotropic and the piezoresistive strain matrix [m] has to be determined, details are specified in the attachment.
 
I would be pleased if you would provide your expert insight on the following questions.
 
 

different coordinate for anisotropicmaterial in FEM simulation

Submitted by taiyangguang1990 on

I have a question which I don not understand. In the simulations of deforming of an anisotropic material like aluminum alloy sheet, different coordinates applied to the specimen model may leads to different results. But why? I mean for example, when the uniaxial tension specimen model is in rolling direction or in transverse direction, the anisotropic yield criterion is the same, the associated flow rule but why the results are different?

different coordinate for anisotropicmaterial in FEM simulation

Submitted by taiyangguang1990 on

I have a question which I don not understand. In the simulations of deforming of an anisotropic material like aluminum alloy sheet, different coordinates applied to the specimen model may leads to different results. But why? I mean for example, when the uniaxial tension specimen model is in rolling direction or in transverse direction, the anisotropic yield criterion is the same, the associated flow rule but why the results are different?

different coordinate for anisotropicmaterial in FEM simulation

Submitted by taiyangguang1990 on

I have a question which I don not understand. In the simulations of deforming of an anisotropic material like aluminum alloy sheet, different coordinates applied to the specimen model may leads to different results. But why? I mean for example, when the uniaxial tension specimen model is in rolling direction or in transverse direction, the anisotropic yield criterion is the same, the associated flow rule but why the results are different?