Peer review
Wikipedia on H-index ---- another excellent article, and also very interesting!
Submitted by Mike Ciavarella on Wed, 2008-07-09 10:12.h-index
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Hirsch number)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the index of scientific research impact. For the economic measure, see Herfindahl index.
- Mike Ciavarella's blog
- 32 comments
- Read more
- 17004 reads
A movement to improve Peer Review in Italy and the relative Forum
Submitted by Mike Ciavarella on Sun, 2008-07-06 20:07.
- Mike Ciavarella's blog
- 1 comment
- Read more
- 1722 reads
Wikipedia on peer review --- an excellent article, an example of wikipedia quality, and interesting anyway!
Submitted by Mike Ciavarella on Sun, 2008-07-06 16:51.Peer review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For Wikipedia's Peer Review area, see Wikipedia:Peer review.
For other uses, see Peer review (disambiguation).
- Mike Ciavarella's blog
- 2 comments
- Read more
- 10342 reads
Science's Editor in Chief and "Friends" Discuss Peer Review and Journal Impact.
Submitted by Mike Ciavarella on Sun, 2008-07-06 16:45.
Science's Editor in Chief and "Friends" Discuss Peer Review and Journal
Impact. (July 4, 2008)
Bruce
Alberts1, Brooks Hanson2
and Katrina L. Kelner3 collaborated to write this
week's Science editorial on peer review. And if for no other reason
than the weekly has one of the highest impact ratings, when Science
speaks science administrators listen.
- Mike Ciavarella's blog
- 10 comments
- Read more
- 4577 reads
How grant reviews work
Submitted by Mogadalai Gururajan on Fri, 2007-06-15 15:23.Here is a video which might be helpful for those writing grant proposals (Hat tip to Dr. Aparna Bhatnagar, Director, Postdoctoral Affairs, Northwestern University for the email alert ):
- Mogadalai Gururajan's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Read more
- 1886 reads
Web journals threaten peer-review system
Submitted by Martijn Feron on Wed, 2006-10-11 13:09.The peer review system has been the established way to select publicated research for decades. However, this way of publishing may come to an end.
New developments in this field embrace the idea that research should not be restricted by the iron grip of the journals. The value of the authors work is debated in cyberspace, leading to a number of consequences. Disadvantages include the possibility of a deluge of junk science due to the unfiltered publishing and online abuse concerning unfairly ridiculing rival's work. On the other side scientific discovery could be accelerated and online critiques may help detect mistakes or fraud more quickly.
Already the first initiatives are present, Philica, PLoS (Public Library of Science). Online journals are not boomingly popular, as they have attracted little attention so far. However, possibilities regarding reaching a broad audience in a fast way seem promising...
- Martijn Feron's blog
- 1 comment
- Read more
- 2142 reads




Recent comments
1 hour 31 min ago
2 hours 3 min ago
3 hours 35 min ago
5 hours 57 min ago
15 hours 49 min ago
22 hours 12 min ago
22 hours 51 min ago
1 day 21 min ago
1 day 1 hour ago
1 day 2 hours ago