<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - metal thin film - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/2437</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;metal thin film&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Sorry for the late reply.</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3320#comment-7884</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;Times New Roman&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Sorry for the late reply. EBSD is a good method to monitor the texture of the film. By the EBSD, the grain size of the Cu could be clearly investigated. Especially, the &lt;em&gt;in-situ&lt;/em&gt; SEM loading with the EBSD could check the grain growth when the Cu film is under tension. Such a &lt;em&gt;in-situ&lt;/em&gt; SEM with EBSD method has been successfully applied to investigate the equal channel angular extruded Mg-3Al-Zn magnesium alloy. However, as you say, the indexing rate is very low for nano grains.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Ying Li Department of Engineering Mechanics Tsinghua University Beijing, 100084, P. R. CHINA &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:56:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ying Li</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7884 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The size effect on failure modes of metal thin films</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3320#comment-7744</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Hi, Teng,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks for pointing this out. Actually it is what I am doing now.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Basically the film failure mode exhibits a ductile-brittle transition as film thickness reduces. But we found that neither the thickness nor the grain size alone will be sufficient to understand the phenomenon. I am trying to take both factors into consideration to give better explanations now.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I&amp;#39;ll send you some preliminary results through email.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nanshu&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:26:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nanshu Lu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7744 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Difficulty with grain size distribution</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3320#comment-7743</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Ying, thanks for your interest and comment.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We haven&amp;#39;t found any efficient way to determine the statistical distribution of nano grains so that we are trying to show straightforward micrographs at this point.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
TEM is not suitable because the film microstructure is very unstable and easy to change during sample preparation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EBSD works well for annealed films with micron-sized grains but the indexing rate is very low for nano grains.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
XRD does not show much broadening because our grain size is not small enough.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I will try AFM to see if it can give reasonable results.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Manually sketching grain boundaries will always work but I will keep it as the last choice.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Do you have any experience or suggestions on this to share with us? Many thanks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nanshu&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nanshu Lu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7743 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Effect of film thickness</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3320#comment-7740</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Nanshu,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Neat experiments! The paper reveals another critical mechanism governing the failure of metal films on polymer substrates.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The films reported in paper are about 1 micron thick. I&amp;#39;m curious about the effect of film thickness on the deformation-induced grain growth. For example, does similar phenomenon occur in a thinner film (say, a few hundred nm thick) on a polymer substrate.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:08:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Teng Li</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7740 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interesting work!</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3320#comment-7737</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot;&gt;Have you done the detailed work on the grain size distribution according to your SEM or FBI imagines? I think the statistical data may be more helpful to understanding the deformation-induced grain growth.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Ying Li Department of Engineering Mechanics Tsinghua University Beijing, 100084, P. R. CHINA &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:26:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ying Li</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7737 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
