<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - discontinuities in mesh free methods - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;discontinuities in mesh free methods&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>problems in representation of the study domain</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-17841</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#39;m working on modelling of induction heating in electromagnetics with meshfree methods (EFG method).&lt;br /&gt;
I want to have explanations on the techniques used in the modelling of&lt;br /&gt;
different regions in presence (air, ferromagnetic material,...) in the&lt;br /&gt;
global domain of study.&lt;br /&gt;
thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:41:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chainette. Leila</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17841 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>problems in representation of the study domain</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-17793</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#39;m working on modelling of induction heating in electromagnetics with meshfree methods (EFG method).&lt;br /&gt;
I want to have explanations on the techniques used in the modelling of different regions in presence (air, ferromagnetic material,...) in the global domain of study.&lt;br /&gt;
thank you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:38:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chainette. Leila</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17793 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I am not sure about</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-17385</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot;&gt;I am not sure about it,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overoll.com/&quot; title=&quot;overoll&quot;&gt;overoll&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:49:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DukeKim</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 17385 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Auto Adaptive interface treatment</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-16302</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Hi, i&amp;#39;m new in the meshfree method. I&amp;#39;m doing my master dissertation in an Auto Adaptive Interface Treatment for the EFGM in eletromagnectic problems. I believe that it can be used for cracks too, just adjust the method. I&amp;#39;m brazilian, and presented in poster format in MOMAG 2010. Each interface has a precision, and for each interface contact it has test points that the mean relative errors between the test points compared to the interfaces precision decide wich interface has to be discreted again. Well, sorry for my english, i didn&amp;#39;t practice for a long time haha. I believe that i&amp;#39;ll finish my work between July and October. If it could help you, tell me. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:32:44 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>maxrobert</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 16302 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>crack in meshless methods</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-15547</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Sukumar,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;I&amp;#39;m working in extending discrete least squares meshless (DLSM) method on modelling  crack propagation. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://imechanica.org/node/9020&quot;&gt;http://imechanica.org/node/9020 &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Regards this I have a question:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;What is the general form of partial differential equation governing a elasticity problem when existing a crack in the domain?&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Best Regards&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;Jafa&lt;/font&gt;r
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:01:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jafar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 15547 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interest method, thank you.</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-9395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Interest method, thank you.&lt;a href=&quot;http://smeshariki-online.ru/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2271/2233225774_7ccc0d6344_m.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;смешарики скачать&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:25:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mixmagtmb</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9395 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>a related thread on meshless methods</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-7857</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Please also see a related thread:&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://imechanica.org/node/3318&quot;&gt;The future of meshless methods&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:25:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zhigang Suo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7857 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TAHOE</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-1624</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Sandia&amp;#39;s Tahoe may be useful package in this regard.  For Atomistic-Continum Bridging. quasicontinuum is multiscale package in this field too. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:02:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roozbeh Sanaei</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1624 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>local extrinsic PUM enriched EFG for crack propagation modelling</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-1583</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You should look at papers of Timon Rabczuk using the following link&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lnm.mw.tum.de/Members/rabczuk&quot; title=&quot;http://www.lnm.mw.tum.de/Members/rabczuk&quot;&gt;http://www.lnm.mw.tum.de/Members/rabczuk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can summarize the basis ideas of the method. I assume that you already know the EFG. Using the local partition of unity concept, we incorporate discontinuous function (Heaviside function H(x)) into the EFG approximation to model the discontinuity due to the crack. So, nodes with domain of influence cut by the crack  are enriched by the H(x). It means:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;u(x) = phi_I(x)u_I +  phi_J H(x) a_J, phi : MLS shape functions as usual&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is the second part of the approximation who handles the crack. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For linear elastic fracture mechanics, since you know the singular field at the crack tip, you can also add them into the approximation. So, nodes whose support contain the crack tip are enriched by the asymptotic functions describing the singular field around the tip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For numerical integration, the background integration cells are used. To get better accuracy, cells cut by crack are divided into triangles (2D) as done in XFEM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They called the method, XEFG (eXtended EFG). The method can be applied to nonlinear materials, large deformation and cohesive cracks. The problem of crack iniation based on loss of hyperbolicity can be handles with ease.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that it was clear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phu &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:17:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>vinh phu nguyen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1583 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: PIMs are discontinue</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-1147</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Generally PIM is not conforming and produces discontinuity in the approximation as domain moves. However there is a way to restor conformability. You may see this reference Liu et al., 2005, &quot;A linearly conforming point interpolation method (LC-PIM) for 2D mechanics problems&quot;, International Journal of Computational Methods, 2, No. 4,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:26:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>abshaw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1147 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PIMs are discontinue</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-1137</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As you know, the PIM shape functions produce a discontinue approximation and it is suitable for methods with local discretization such as MLPG. But I am not sure about it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:59:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>83684024</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1137 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re:PIM with EFG ?</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-1046</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Usual form of EFG is based on MLS approximation of the target function. However, to my knowledge any approximation scheme can be used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 14:22:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>abshaw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1046 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PIM with EFG ?</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-1030</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Is it possible using PIM shape function with EFG method?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:11:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>83684024</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1030 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>discontinuities in mesh free methods</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-916</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for all your insightful replies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The  Cracking particles don&amp;#39;t really solve my problem because I would need something that is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- as much independent as possible from sampling density (of the particles)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- unified tratment for non convex object and artifical discontinuities (it seems to me that only the visibility criterion fullfills this need)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- very efficient to compute, to be applied in a 3D interactive context.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m currently trying to find a way to extend the visibility criterion to something less prone to unwanted discontinuities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you again,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:48:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robilant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 916 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A paper using phase field to simulate dynamic fracture</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comment-888</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Gracie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are several papers about use of phase field to simulate dynamic crack propagation, particularly in brittle materials. Alain Karma have done very excellent research work on this topic. One of their paper is entitled &amp;quot;phase-field model of Mode 3 dynamic fracture&amp;quot;. You can find the paper via arXiv: cond-mat/0105034, 2001. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:49:45 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jinxiong Zhou</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 888 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>discontinuities in mesh free methods</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wish to ask where to find literature about introducing discontinuities in the shape functions to simulate cracks in mesh free methods.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found the visibility criterion, the diffraction method and the transparency method referred in the (I think vey good) survey by Fries and Matthies  &amp;quot;classification and overview of meshdree methods&amp;quot; but nothing else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thank you,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rob &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.imechanica.org/node/742#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/357">Computational Mechanics Forum</category>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/128">education</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:40:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>robilant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">742 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

