<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Three-dimensional finite deformation beam model - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5685</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Three-dimensional finite deformation beam model&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Thank you for your</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5685#comment-11334</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Thank you for your post.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-Rani
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:32:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rani</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 11334 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Simo-Vu Quoc rods</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5685#comment-11306</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
You can check out the McRobie and Lasenby paper on Simo-VuQuoc rods where they have corrected a few typos.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The link is :
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/60501310/abstract&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/60501310/abstract&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-- Biswajit&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:44:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Biswajit Banerjee</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 11306 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Three-dimensional finite deformation beam model</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5685</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Dear all,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Has anyone ever tried to implement Simo&amp;#39;s three-dimensional finite-strain rod model (1986) Here is the link of the paper: &amp;nbsp;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6V29-47X7BWC-44&amp;amp;_user=4423&amp;amp;_coverDate=10%2F31%2F1986&amp;amp;_alid=934572023&amp;amp;_rdoc=41&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_cdi=5697&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_ct=48&amp;amp;_acct=C000059605&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=4423&amp;amp;md5=acfb1cd82c32b5f08581236e71b38cb4&quot;&gt;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6V29-47X7BWC-44&amp;amp;_user=4423&amp;amp;_coverDate=10%2F31%2F1986&amp;amp;_alid=934572023&amp;amp;_rdoc=41&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_cdi=5697&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_ct=48&amp;amp;_acct=C000059605&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=4423&amp;amp;md5=acfb1cd82c32b5f08581236e71b38cb4&lt;/a&gt;)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have spotted a couple of typos in the formulation, but I may still be missing a few ones since my solution does not converge for every situation. To be more specific, the way the configuration is updated ( especially for the incremental&amp;nbsp;rotation) might be tricky.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Any comment or suggestion is more than welcome.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Sincerely,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Rani
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5685#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/128">education</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:15:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rani</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5685 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

