<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Failure Surface Graphics in Stress Space - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5473</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Failure Surface Graphics in Stress Space&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Failure Surface Graphics in Stress Space</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5473</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;A new section has been added to the website on failure criteria for engineering materials.&amp;nbsp; This new work displays many different three-dimensional computer graphics of failure criteria surfaces in stress space. The full range of isotropic materials are covered from ductile metals to brittle ceramics and glasses and beyond.&amp;nbsp; All of these computer generated graphics can be seen at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.failurecriteria.com/failuresurfacegr.html&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;www.failurecriteria.com/failuresurfacegr.html&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The limiting case of ductile behavior is that of the Mises criterion with its cylindrical failure surface representation.&amp;nbsp; A related historical uncertainty has always involved the search for and the identification of the opposite and counter-balancing limiting case, that of the brittle limit.&amp;nbsp; The mathematical form of the present physical theory admits and gives this limiting case at the brittle end of the scale.&amp;nbsp; The corresponding three dimensional graphic form for this limiting case is explicitly shown.&amp;nbsp; In principal stress space the brittle limit failure surface form is composed of a triangular pyramid shape near the origin, which transitions into a paraboloid, with corners between the two competing modes of failure, along with other crucial features.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The entire theory and all of the graphical forms are completely calibrated by only two failure properties, the uniaxial tensile and compressive strengths.&amp;nbsp; The usage of the two uniaxial strengths is far more efficient, effective, and general than are forms combining the shear strength with any other strength measure(s).&amp;nbsp; Many other related matters also are covered at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.FailureCriteria.com&quot; title=&quot;www.FailureCriteria.com&quot;&gt;www.FailureCriteria.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.imechanica.org/node/5473#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/76">research</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:11:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Richard M. Christensen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5473 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

