<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Pressure Overclosure - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3650</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pressure Overclosure&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Pressure Overclosure</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3650</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Dear Friends,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;         I&amp;#39;m using *SURFACE BEHAVIOUR option with PRESSURE-OVERCLOSUR E=EXPONENTIAL for my door analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   I have used c0=.01 and P0=1 in 1st case&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;  and c0=0.01 and P0=100 in 2nd case &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; and getting different displacement value at the loading nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; So anyone tell me the significance of both the runs and which result i assume to be close to the real.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if i have removes the PRESSURE-OVERCLOSUR E relationship then my run terminates with the error of convergence problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Plz help me out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.imechanica.org/node/3650#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:08:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pradeepkec</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3650 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
