http://www.imechanica.org/node/3496 Comments for "FEM" en http://www.imechanica.org/node/3496#comment-8171 <p> <font size="2">answer to this question is a little professional!</font> </p> <p> <font size="3">simple beam 1d, simple shell 2d </font><img src="http://imechanica.org/modules/tinymce/includes/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-smile.gif" border="0" alt="Smile" title="Smile" /> </p> <br class="clear" /> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:44:47 -0400 RoozbehSanaei comment 8171 at http://www.imechanica.org http://www.imechanica.org/node/3496#comment-8168 <p>I don&#39;t understand your question. I think you&#39;ll have to provide a much clearer question if someone is to be able to help you.</p> <br class="clear" /> Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:27:46 -0400 Mike Graham comment 8168 at http://www.imechanica.org http://www.imechanica.org/node/3496 <p>why not beam make mesh,shell make mesh</p> <br class="clear" /> http://www.imechanica.org/node/3496#comments Computational Mechanics Forum job mesh Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:21:16 -0400 mangal 3496 at http://www.imechanica.org