<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Naming the SI Unit for Fracture Toughness (KIC) - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/1780</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Naming the SI Unit for Fracture Toughness (KIC)&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>HI TO ALL


 DEAR</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/1780#comment-5646</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
HI TO ALL
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;DEAR FRIENDS,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I TOO AGREE WITH Mr. RAMDAS FOR RECOMMENDING THE NAME OF GRIFFITH AS A SI UNIT FOR FRACTURE TOUGHNESS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;WARMLY
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ABHIJIT
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:25:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ABHIJIT NALAWADE</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5646 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That is one comment in...</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/1780#comment-4103</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Dear Ramdas,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks for your feedback. I very much appreciate it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I do have an opinion on the matter, but would like to reserve it for the time being. ... I would rather that others, too, expressed what they felt about the issue...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Once a few more comments come in, I will sure go ahead and add my view of the matter below here. Anyways, special thanks to you, once again,&amp;nbsp;for being the lone commenter for something like a week by now!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:40:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ajit R. Jadhav</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4103 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>1 Griffith = 1 MPa.m^0.5</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/1780#comment-4015</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hi,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Yes, why not.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The units of KiC (i=I, II and&amp;nbsp;III) look odd - MPa.m^0.5.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I feel Griffith may be&amp;nbsp;a good choice, because, the Fracture Mechanics starts with Griffith&amp;#39;s theory and we encounter KIC there at the first time.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1 Griffth = 1 MPa.m^0.5
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;- Ramdas.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 02:38:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ramdas chennamsetti</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4015 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Naming the SI Unit for Fracture Toughness (KIC)</title>
 <link>http://www.imechanica.org/node/1780</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
To: Engineers, Fracture Analysts, Mechanicians, Physicists...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In science and engineering, we have an excellent tradition: naming a physical unit using&amp;nbsp;the name of a prominent personality from the concerned field. For example, in SI system, we measure force in newton, work in joule, power in watt...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But the unit of fracture toughness, i.e. KIC, is too lengthy to pronounce: (mega) pascal-underoot-meter. Further, it&amp;nbsp;has also been in use for something like half a century by now, perhaps more. So, how do you like the idea of giving a name to this unit?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As far as I can see, the possible choices are:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-- Griffith (G)&lt;br /&gt;
-- Irwin (I)&lt;br /&gt;
-- Some other person (Please specify)&lt;br /&gt;
-- None. The physical quantity KIC is not necessarily the best measure of toughness... We should wait for the research to evolve a better measure.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Something else (though I fail to see what&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;could be)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Please note, this is not a suggestion for a poll. (I mean, rather, that things like this should never be finalized purely by polls alone!)&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But anyways, I would appreciate knowing what you think... Please leave your comment below...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.imechanica.org/node/1780#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/75">mechanician</category>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/32">fracture mechanics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/618">toughness</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:21:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ajit R. Jadhav</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1780 at http://www.imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
